Monday, March 31, 2014
Friday, March 14, 2014
This article articulates the challenge women face when they learn they are paid less than their male colleagues for work of equal importance.
http://www.startribune.com/local/250266971.html
Ellen Ewald is telling her story at the Minnesota State Capitol in hopes of passing a bill to extend pay equity requirements to state contractors.
The Pay Equity Coalition of Minnesota supports her 100%!
Patty Tanji
Ellen Ewald is telling her story at the Minnesota State Capitol in hopes of passing a bill to extend pay equity requirements to state contractors.
The Pay Equity Coalition of Minnesota supports her 100%!
Patty Tanji
Thursday, March 6, 2014
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
Monday, January 6, 2014
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Getting the most from your pay system
Employers must be prepared to defend their pay systems. Put a
company-wide system in place so that decisions about pay are not made in a
vacuum and are aligned with the company's strategic purpose.
We suggest the use of multiple tools for pay setting: 1. "market
rates" derived from salary surveys; 2. "performance pay" derived
from assessing individual employees; 3. "job evaluation" ratings
which provide internal equity by comparing levels of skill and responsibility
across all jobs in the company.
Problems can arise when those systems are not well documented and
objective - and since that information (about the tools or the salaries
themselves) is usually not transparent either within or outside the company,
very few people even inside the company can be sure the system is fair,
objective, and has gender-neutral impact. That factor alone explains why
employers are vulnerable to lawsuits, in which a complainant can ask for more
information about the process which may have resulted in large-scale inequities
with regard to gender, race, etc. "We did not intend to
discriminate" is not going to be a satisfactory response.
While all those systems, presumably well documented and explained to
everyone, are perfectly legal, one reason for the rising interest in job
evaluation is that it has been proven as a useful and well-documented tool for
identifying and eliminating gender pay inequities in Minnesota's public sector.
In contrast, it appears that "the market" (often not well documented)
is the primary system used. Minnesota's two public sector laws state that
"compensation relationships are equitable" when "the primary
consideration in negotiating, establishing, recommending, and approving
compensation is comparable worth value in relationship to other employee
positions within" the company. In other words, state law requires
that job evaluation (internal equity) takes precedence over salary surveys ("the
market") is pay setting. Of course exceptions are allowed for
"recruitment difficulties" or "retention difficulties,"
when supported by facts.
Most companies now use three systems, and that's OK if they can be
documented & assessed to make sure there's no pattern of lower pay for
women. But we advocate for much greater reliance on job evaluation than on
salary surveys, which are more likely to import the kind of sex bias (however
unintentional) that has perpetuated the earnings gap.
Bonnie Watkins, Pay Equity Coalition of Minnesota member.
Bonnie Watkins, Pay Equity Coalition of Minnesota member.
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Fair Pay For Women Public Policy Agenda
Vision: The
gender pay gap is eliminated.
Mission: Work
toward public policy that accomplishes the following:
·
Women are paid equally as men for work of
comparable value.
·
Work that is traditionally “women’s work” is
valued by society and paid accordingly.
·
Poverty among women and single-parent households
is reduced.
·
Women make choices and learn skills that result
in higher pay.
Causes of the Gender
Pay Gap:
·
Societal under-valuation of women-dominated
professions.
·
External comparisons of pay and job titles that
perpetuate past inequities.
·
A lack of attention by employers of internal pay differentials
by gender.
·
Job and educational degree segregation.
·
Non-union jobs leading to lack of employee
advocacy pertaining to pay.
·
Hours worked/attachment to workforce.
·
Salary negotiation skills.
·
Lack of employer transparency in employee
compensation.
·
Sex bias. Sex bias plays a role in each of the
above causes, but according to the U.S. Dept. of Labor, differences between workers
and their jobs explain about 60% of the pay gap, leaving 40% likely solely
attributable to gender discrimination.
·
Combined sex bias and racism dramatically increases
the effects of these factors on women of color and immigrant women.
Public Policy Agenda:
·
Encourage private industry to incorporate pay
equity principles.
o
State contractors’ pay equity legislation.
o
State certification of “fair pay employers.”
·
Increase minimum wage.
·
Prohibit retaliation for discussion of
compensation/require private employers to disclose salary range information.
·
Encourage
the Minnesota Dept. of Human Rights to provide more visible support for both
proactive and complaint-based efforts to enforce existing equal pay laws.
·
Affordable childcare.
·
Paid maternity and family leave.
·
Require employers to provide reasonable
accommodations for pregnant employees.
·
Appoint OESW Executive Director.
·
Legislative resolution calling upon Congress to
pass the Paycheck Fairness Act.
·
Encourage women and girls to pursue STEM
education and women entrepreneurs to start businesses in traditionally male
industries, including STEM industries.
·
Ensure that existing opportunities for
women-owned businesses through the state Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
program are properly and fairly administered.
·
Provide women with training in salary
negotiation skills.
·
Maintain and defend Minnesota’s state and local
government pay equity laws.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)